<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Read only if you know Javascript&#8230;</title>
	<link>http://blog.soulgook.com/2007/03/24/read-only-if-you-know-javascript/</link>
	<description>Not what yo' mama said.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 18:46:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://blog.soulgook.com/2007/03/24/read-only-if-you-know-javascript/#comment-49</link>
		<author>Michael</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2007 23:21:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.soulgook.com/2007/03/24/read-only-if-you-know-javascript/#comment-49</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;Cool.  Perl also does closures; they act about the same.  My favorite use for closures in perl was for pre-compiling complex regexes.  If you have a really big regex (like several hundred patterns OR'ed together), then creating a function in a closure with that regex comparison can make the comparison run several hundred times faster.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool.  Perl also does closures; they act about the same.  My favorite use for closures in perl was for pre-compiling complex regexes.  If you have a really big regex (like several hundred patterns OR&#8217;ed together), then creating a function in a closure with that regex comparison can make the comparison run several hundred times faster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SoulGook</title>
		<link>http://blog.soulgook.com/2007/03/24/read-only-if-you-know-javascript/#comment-50</link>
		<author>SoulGook</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 02:47:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.soulgook.com/2007/03/24/read-only-if-you-know-javascript/#comment-50</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;When I was screwing around with interpreting wiki syntax in Javascript a few months ago, I was trying to figure out a way to get some of the more intense regexes to go faster...I wonder if this would have helped (it didn't REALLY matter, as I was already in the 100ms range, but you know...ego and all.)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I was screwing around with interpreting wiki syntax in Javascript a few months ago, I was trying to figure out a way to get some of the more intense regexes to go faster&#8230;I wonder if this would have helped (it didn&#8217;t REALLY matter, as I was already in the 100ms range, but you know&#8230;ego and all.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
